🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a growing chorus of states are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our children's youth". A law may be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "one of the tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged the legislature to enact a law increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a good first step," stated the MEP driving the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a future ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. However, the government committed to further research the topic.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization established by the family of a girl who died after viewing harmful social media material suggests that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are secure and suitable for children," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, action is mostly unfolding at the regional government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with any further use needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills mandating guardian approval for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to copy this lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies adopt a more cautious stance. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that governments internationally are no longer content to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.